Publication Ethics

Journal of Engineering, Applied Science and Humanities: The publication of a research paper in a peer-reviewed journal is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society of society-owned or sponsored journals.

A respected network of knowledge can only be developed if the research paper is published in an open peer reviewed journal. It maintains the transparency among the authors and institutions that support the particular paper. Since, it is an open platform, it is important for all the parties including the author, the publisher, the journal editor, sponsored journals and the peer reviewer to agree with the paper before its publication. The content has to abide by the pre-decided ethical policies and the standards.

Duties of Editors

  •    Acceptance/Rejection/Acceptance with modification decision
  •    Fair play in review
  •    Confidentiality
  •    Disclosure and Conflicts of interest
  •    Involvement and cooperation in investigations

Duties of Reviewers

  •    Contribution to Editorial Decision
  •    Promptness
  •    Confidentiality
  •    Standards of Objectivity
  •    Acknowledgement of Source
  •    Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Duties of Authors

  •    Reporting standards
  •    Data Access and Retention
  •    Originality and Plagiarism
  •    Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
  •    Acknowledgement of Sources
  •    Authorship of the Paper
  •    Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
  •    Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
  •    Fundamental errors in published works

Duties of the Publisher

Editorial decisions are independent of the advertising, reprint and other commercial revenue. Besides that, we help our editors in communications with other publishers or journals wherever required. Our networking with other publishers and industry associations allow us to set standards for the practices on ethical matters, errors and renunciations which help us to provide expert legal reviews if and when required.

Principles of Transparency

  1. Peer review process: JEASH is a multi-disciplinary journal with a focus on education, management, health, and technology. This process, as well as any policies related to the journal’s peer review procedures, is clearly described on the journal’s Web site 
  2. Governing Body: JEASH has very strong editorial board, whose members are recognized experts in the subject areas included within the journal’s scope. The full names and affiliations of the journal’s editors are provided on the journal’s Web site https://jeashjournal.com/ 
  3. Contact information: Journal is provided the contact information for the editorial office of JEASH Editorial Team
  4. Author fees / Access: The Journal database is fully open access and full text of published articles are available for everyone who can get access to the Journal website free of cost. Besides, the authors never pay any charges for submission.
  5. Copyright: Journals made clear the type of copyright under which authors' work will be published.  Upon acceptance of the manuscript, authors will be asked to complete a 'Journal Publishing Agreement.
  6. Identification of and dealing with allegations of research misconduct: Editor-in-Chief takes reasonable steps to identify and prevent the publication of papers where research misconduct has occurred, including plagiarism, citation manipulation, and data falsification/fabrication, among others.
  7. Web site: A journal’s Web site https://jeashjournal.com/ contains that care has been taken to ensure high ethical and professional standards.
  8. Name of journal: Journal of Engineering Applied Science and Humanities (JEASH) has unique and not one that is easily confused with another journal
  9. Conflicts of interest: Authors are requested to evident whether impending conflicts do or do not exist while submitting their articles to JEASH through the Conflict of Interest Disclosure form.
  10. Publishing schedule: The periodicity at which a journal publishes is clearly indicated on the journal home page on the notice board in the sidebar https://jeashjournal.com/
  11. Archiving: A journal’s plan for electronic backup and preservation of access to the journal content is clearly indicated Archives

Violation of Publication Ethics

  1. Plagiarism:  The building block of the success of scientific publishing is the peer-review process. JEASH promises its authors to deliver plagiarism-free content thus ensuring and abiding by all the ethical aspects of publishing. The JEASH uses Turnitin plagiarism software for it similarities test
  2. Data Fabrication and Falsification: Data fabrication and falsification means the researcher did not really carry out the study, but made up data or results and recorded or reported the fabricated information. Data falsification means the researcher did the experiment, but manipulated, changed, or omitted data or results from the research findings.
  3. Simultaneous Submission: Simultaneous submission occurs when a manuscript (or substantial sections from a manuscript) is submitted to a journal when it is already under consideration by another journal.
  4. Duplicate Publication: Duplicate publication occurs when two or more papers, without full cross-referencing, share essentially the same hypotheses, data, discussion points, and conclusions.
  5. Redundant Publications: Redundant publications involve the inappropriate division of study outcomes into several articles, most often consequent to the desire to plump academic vitae.
  6. Improper Author Contribution or Attribution: All listed authors must have made a significant scientific contribution to the research in the manuscript and approved all its claims. Don’t forget to list everyone who made a significant scientific contribution, including students and laboratory technicians.
  7. Citation Manipulation: Citation Manipulation is including excessive citations, in the submitted manuscript, that do not contribute to the scholarly content of the article and have been included solely for the purpose of increasing citations to a given author’s work, or to articles published in a particular journal. This leads to misrepresenting the importance of the specific work and journal in which it appears and is thus a form of scientific misconduct.
  8. Sanctions: In the event that there are documented violations of any of the above-mentioned policies in any journal, regardless of whether or not the violations occurred in a journal, the following sanctions will be applied: (i) Immediate rejection of the infringing manuscript, (ii)Immediate rejection of every other manuscript submitted to any journal published by any of the authors of the infringing manuscript, (iii) Prohibition will be imposed for a minimum of 36 months against all of the authors for any new submissions to any journal, either individually or in combination with other authors of the infringing manuscript, and (iv) Prohibition against all of the authors from serving on the Editorial Board of any journal.

Handling Cases of Misconduct

Once JEASH confirms a violation against JEASH publication ethics, JEASH addresses ethical concerns diligently following an issue-specific standard practice as summarized below.

  1. The first action of the journal Editor is to inform the Editorial Office of JEASH by supplying copies of the relevant material and a draft letter to the corresponding author asking for an explanation in a nonjudgmental manner.
  2. If the author’s explanation is unacceptable and it seems that serious unethical conduct has taken place, the matter is referred to the Publication Committee via Editorial Office.  After deliberation, the Committee will decide whether the case is sufficiently serious to warrant a ban on future submissions. 
  3. If the infraction is less severe, the Editor, upon the advice of the Publication Committee, sends the author a letter of reprimand and reminds the author of JEASH publication policies; if the manuscript has been published, the Editor may request the author to publish an apology in the journal to correct the record.
  4. Notification will be sent to corresponding author and any work by the author responsible for the violation or any work these persons coauthored that is under review by JEASH journal will be rejected immediately.
  5. The authors are prohibited from serving on the JEASH editorial board and serving as a reviewer for JEASH Journal. JEASH reserves the right to take more action.
  6. In extreme cases, notifications will be sent to the affiliations of the authors and the authors are prohibited from submitting their work to JEASH for 5 years.
  7. In serious cases of fraud that result in the retraction of the article, a retraction notice will be published in the journal and will be linked to the article in the online version. The online version will also be marked “retracted” with the retraction date.

Topics

  • JEASH is known to cover all the fields connected with research fields in education, management, health, and technology

After the selection, the manuscript of the paper/article is published in the Journal of Engineering, Applied Science and Humanities (JEASH) Digital Library.